Nabokov, The Original of Laura, and the idea of "wanting something to be destroyed."

Here’s what I think about the fiasco: if Nabokov had really wanted the novel destroyed, he would have destroyed it himself. And he didn’t. So now, we get to read it. Plus, it’ll be better than most of the shite that passes off as literature these days.

This is something that Max Brod, Kafka’s literary executor, discussed at length. What he basically said: Ultimately, Kafka never burned his own books, and the fact that he left them with someone he knew would publish them speaks volumes.

So I say: Publish, and insert the proviso, “This work was not completed.”

Link via Laila and Maud

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Nabokov, The Original of Laura, and the idea of "wanting something to be destroyed."

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s